SILICON VALLEY, Calif., April 21, 2009 (AScribe Newswire) — In his December 2003 astro-cosmology book, “How Dark Matter Created Dark Energy and the Sun,” Bell Labs-trained Jerome Drexler disclosed and plausibly explained the identity and nature of the dark matter of the universe. Since then no scientist has written a scientific paper, book, or article opposing Drexler’s relativistic-proton dark matter.
Furthermore during this same five-year period, Drexler published two scientific papers, two more astro-cosmology books in 2006 and 2008, and 19 recent scientific articles on dark matter and dark matter cosmology that have not been opposed in any scientific papers or articles. Moreover, recent scientific support for Drexler’s work has come from the University of Chicago, CEA Saclay, France, the Russian Academy of Sciences, and indirectly (by their detection of signatures of Drexler’s dark matter cosmology) from NASA, Cardiff University, Harvard-Smithsonian, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
UC Santa Cruz’s Cold Dark Matter, Drexler’s principal competition, has faced published opposition recently from scientists at Cambridge University, Cardiff University, NASA, New York University, UC San Diego, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and the University of Chicago. (See on the Internet, AScribe newswire dated November 10, 2008 entitled, “Doubts Cast on Cold Dark Matter by Cambridge, Cardiff U, CEA Saclay, NYU, Russian Academy of Sciences, UC San Diego.”)
There appears to be no recently published noteworthy scientific support for UC Santa Cruz’s Cold Dark Matter cosmology except from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which then effectively withdrew their support on January 25, 2009 when they published a strongly opposing scientific paper in the journal Nature. The paper entitled, “Cold streams in early massive hot haloes as the main mode of galaxy formation,” argues that most large galaxies formed without mergers. However, a principal Cold Dark Matter tenet argues the opposite, that large galaxies are formed through mergers of small galaxies.
Drexler’s books not only explain the precise nature of dark matter and why the expansion of the universe is accelerating (dark energy), but also how cosmic inflation started and stopped, where ultra-high-energy cosmic rays derive their enormous energy, the nature of the cosmic web, and how the big bang satisfied the Second Law of Thermodynamics. No scientist had explained any one of these cosmic phenomena prior to Drexler’s publications. No scientist has publicly opposed these Drexler explanations.
Moreover, Drexler links all of these phenomena into a single unified theory he calls “dark matter cosmology”. His cosmology involves astronomical data, the laws of physics, the principles of logic and physics-based concepts such as “dark matter relationism”, a “relativistic big bang,” and soft X-ray/EUV synchrotron emission from relativistic dark matter protons traversing magnetic fields. Neither superstring theory nor multiple universes are necessary in his dark matter cosmology to support his explanations.
Drexler’s books, scientific papers and articles provide substantial evidence that his dark matter cosmology plausibly solves/explains twenty previously unsolved cosmic enigmas, mysteries, anomalies, or conundrums. In order for him to solve/explain twenty such cosmic mysteries in a plausible and convincing manner, his dark matter cosmology must be substantially valid — or else he must be impossibly lucky.
For the above reasons, the timing appears right for a symposium in early 2010 devoted to relativistic-proton dark matter cosmology. It should encompass the nature of dark matter, why the expansion of the universe is accelerating (dark energy), how cosmic inflation started and stopped, where ultra-high-energy cosmic rays derive their enormous energy, the nature of the cosmic web, how the big bang satisfied the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and the possible role(s) of muons in star formation.
It is important that the symposium also considers the non-scientific factors in dark matter cosmology represented by the following three paragraphs. Those interested in the launching the symposium, serving on a committee, or making a presentation should inform Jerome Drexler of their interests by E-mail at drexlerastro@aol.com or by phone at 650-941-2716. His Web site is at http://www.jeromedrexler.org .
It is somewhat surprising that almost three years after Drexler’s May 2006 book solved at least 20 cosmic mysteries using dark matter cosmology, mainstream cosmologists apparently have not published solutions/explanations for any of them. Apparently, they are publishing obsolescent cosmology books to be used for teaching our future cosmologists, astrophysicists, and astronomers.
Thus, NASA, the National Science Foundation (NSF), the U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE), the ESO, and the ESA may be paying for research seeking solutions to cosmic mysteries that may have been solved, explained, or clarified already in Drexler’s 2003, 2006 or 2008 astro-cosmology books or his 2005 or 2007 scientific papers or his nineteen 2008/2009 scientific articles.
Because of the issues described in the previous two paragraphs, a symposium on Drexler’s dark matter cosmology would be particularly beneficial to institutions such as NASA, the NSF, the U.S. DOE, ESO, ESA and to the private foundations of W.M. Keck, Alfred P. Sloan, Gordon Moore (who funds Caltech), Fred Kavli (who funds Stanford and U Chicago), Mike Lazaridis (of BlackBerry (TM) fame funds the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Canada), Peter Gruber, John Templeton, and Bruce McWilliams (who funds Carnegie Mellon U) who are financially supporting cosmological research.
Drexler’s 292-page, March 2008, dark matter cosmology paperback, “Discovering Postmodern Cosmology,” was written to provide solutions to the five top priority cosmic- phenomena enigmas and extensive evidence that mainstream cosmology is seriously flawed and should be overhauled, and to explain how that might be accomplished.
